On Friday 17 May 2002 22:28, Piotr Szymanski wrote:

> This is total bogus! Although compilation takes much time, kdebase compil=
ed
> with gcc-3.1 on my Duron 800 as long as with 2.95

I compared compilation times between gcc 2.95 and some gcc3 HEAD versions=20
several times, and now I used the 3.1 release version to find out if my=20
results are valid for it, too. Each time, compilation times with 3.1/HEAD=20
were about twice as long as with 2.95, and I don't see any numbers at all=20
from you. Still you call my numbers "total bogus", and I have to say I don'=
t=20
believe you. I did only try qt-copy right now, but I don't see why this=20
should be different for kdebase. But if your compilation times are really=20
equal for 2.95 and 3.1, then I'd like to find out why they aren't for me. D=
id=20
you do anything special?