[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: GCC 3.1 Released
From:       Alexander Kellett <kelletta () eidetica ! com>
Date:       2002-05-16 13:13:20
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Andreas Simon wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2002 12:08, Erik Meusel wrote:
> BTW: Next Mandrake, and I guess Redhat too, releases will
> have gcc 3.1.x as standard compiler.

And gentoo (as noted in the article in question iirc)
While I agree that it would be a very nice outcome to
have 3.1 compile without any warnings, what happens in 
the case that another compiler is not able to compile
the perfect code for 3.1?, do we fill everything with 
ugly preprocesser magic? or choose the path that fits
both well?

Will 3.2 be 'strict' and not 'traditional'?

Alex
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]