On Tuesday 07 May 2002 01:26, Waldo Bastian wrote:
>
> We had that common point with KDE 3.0 but I don't see why everything sh=
ould
> be released at a common point for further releases. The only point of
> concern would be, as David already mentioned, that released application=
s
> don't depend on unreleased changes in e.g. kdelibs.

That is also a recurring problem for them. I suppose it could work in pra=
ctice=20
if it was made clear that only "KDE" releases would introduce lib changes=
,=20
but each application (or group of applications) was free to follow its ow=
n=20
release "sub cycle" in between, depending only on the stable libs. I seem=
 to=20
recall this has already been discussed, hasn't it ?

--=20
=09=09=09=09Guillaume
=09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org