From kde-core-devel  Sun Apr 07 10:02:18 2002
From: Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 10:02:18 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: KOffice review in German c't
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=101819251108464

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

{sorry, I am not subscribed to koffice-devel]

Hi!

German computer magazine c't has tested six office packages for Linux. In=
=20
short - the results ( (++) (+) ( ) (-) (--) -> very good ... very bad ):

               GnomeOffice   Hancom   KOffice   OpenOffice   StarOffice
Version             -          2.0     1.1.1       641C         6.0

Installation       (-)         (++)     (++)       (++)         (++)

Functionality      (+)         (+)      ( )         (+)          (+)

Text part          (-)         (+)      ( )        (++)         (++)

Spreadsheet        (+)         (+)      ( )        (++)         (++)

Usability          ( )         ( )      (+)         (+)          (+)

Stability          (+)         (++)     (-)!        ( )          (+)

- - The good mark for KOffice's usablilty comes from the tight integratio=
n.
- - The very good mark for KOffice's installation stems from the fact tha=
t it's=20
part of almost every distribution already and that it hasn't many lib=20
depedencies (that's why Gnome did so badly there).
- - The bad mark for KOffice's stability stems from it being the package =
that=20
most often crashed on them during testing (I hope the KOffice developers=20
received all corresponding bug reports; if not, complain to to the author=
s=20
Dieter Brors and Oliver Dietrich at {db,odi}(at)ct.heise.de ;-).


Marc

- --=20
Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8sBkr3oWD+L2/6DgRAl0XAKDQVDl0zvaGPc7O6SCtJ5r5Wd3zFQCgrEgs
F4xcB06VDDOyHZzRkLdMXCs=3D
=3DT+ia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----