[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE 3.0 - the last steps
From:       Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date:       2002-03-21 19:00:27
[Download RAW message or body]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 21 March 2002 19:01, Rolf Magnus wrote:
> On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:32, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > Screenshot#1 shows a Konq in the background, running on the "old"
> > qt-copy and the folder list of KMail running the current qt-copy
> > (note the tiny space between listviewitems)
>
> Hmm, I just note the huge spacing in the left one. The right one
> looks good to me. Maybe the spacing could be bigger, but the left one
> is definitely too big.

No, it isn't. This is on a 133dpi display. Scale it down to see what's 
wrong.

> > Screenshot#2 shows an example text in KMail's reader. It's quite
> > hard to read what with the small \baselineskip.
>
> Why not use a bigger font then?

Up until now I was very happy with this font and size. I possibly know a 
bit more about typesetting (what with part of my job being LaTeXing 
math. articles) than the average user, and the "Durchschuss" is much 
too small.
See attached screenshot where the size has been increased, but the 
Durchschuss is still to small.
Seems like a fixed offset is used now, independent of the font size (in 
pixels) or the space is calculated in px based on font size in pt.
Something like that.

Marc

- -- 
Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8mi3L3oWD+L2/6DgRAtRIAKC4UErcBohtrawwfJnKSQj9cT7GVACePQGl
q0rmdkwyOFPn6sQEeIvLgFw=
=Ve/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

["bigger-font.png" (image/png)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]