On Thursday 07 March 2002 08:36 am, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> > oups, I thought you had already committed that. I'm fine with the
> > patch (only the friendships of KCompTreeNode are a thorn in my eye --
> > can you add a public accessor for "next", maybe?).
>
> Ok, I made it a public member.  It's a private class, and I would have =
to
> write an accessor _and_ a setter which is really stupid, if it only
> accesses one member by assignment and return.  I.e. I check the patch i=
n
> as attached to this mail.

I'm glad to see the ZoneAllocator being brought to life again :-)

Cheers,
Waldo
--=20
Advanced technology only happens when people take a basic idea and add to=
 it.
 -- Bob Bemer