On Sunday 03 March 2002 22:39, David Faure wrote:
> Yes, but the signals won't be listened to at all. Ok, then no docu, signals
> remain unrelated to those methods.

I am not sure what you mean by "won't be listened to at all", sorry...

> > Maybe an additional signal dataAvailable() might make sense.
>
> Huh? It's the hosting application that sends the data, it's not the part
> that loads it. The part just displays the data sent to it.

Eh, indeed. I was thinking a bit too much about the future use that I have 
for this API extension, but in my particular case I need other API stuff as 
well, so I can add the code for that to a subclass or so.

> Sure, but thinking about the whole design is the only way to make sure
> the virtual methods are okay ;)

Agreed.

Martijn