--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:41:38PM +0100, aleXXX wrote: > On Thursday 28 February 2002 11:01, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > > He explained privately; the /etc/lisarc is hard-coded; that is the prob= lem. >=20 > I intentionally made the path hard-coded. > In former versions lisa tried to look for the config file in the kde conf= ig=20 > dirs, this lead to many problems, since the user has to take care that li= sa=20 > is started (at boot time). With the former scheme there were options whet= her=20 > lisa should look in the kde-1-config-dirs (i.e. $KDEDIR/share/config and= =20 > ~/.kde/share/config I think) or in kde-2-config-dirs (via kde-config) or= in=20 > unix-style config dirs (i.e. /etc/lisarc and ~/.lisarc). Since there were= to=20 > many points where things could go wrong I decided to support only /etc/li= sarc=20 > and ~/.lisarc. > And since lisa doesn't link any Qt/KDE lib, it can't use the KDE classes= =20 > therefor. Understood; that is not my problem. > I still don't understand the problem. Well the problem is that I want a mimimum maintainance software system. In = other=20 words I don't like to have a config path hardcoded in 5 places in the class= es. I'd much rather like a header file #define or static where the path is. It = simply makes maintainance easier. I don't know anything about the problems you describe above; I simply belie= ve you that the path has to be hardcoded; but for example debian will probably put= the=20 file somewhere else, lets allow them to do that with a simple patch that up= dates 1 string in 1 header file. So we don't get bug reports that are created by = the overlooking of 1 of the 5 strings that are all the same. --=20 Thomas Zander zander@earthling.n= et The only thing worse than failure is the fear of trying something new --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8fqOiCojCW6H2z/QRAslDAJ94Psea0SYQYmrpoda4jT0r9SUMSACgwIJm kR+W4qGIW21WfGFvRqzvUQw= =LuSf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1--