On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:57:33AM +0100, ossi@mail.kde.org wrote: > a) this is not necessarily true. some languages/toolkits/oses don't > even provide (useful, that is complete) async i/o, so the use of > threads is the only solution. > also, its surely a question of preference (some like to go the hard way, > you know :). This is a fairly grand assumption. Out here pthreads (by default) are implemented in userspace - stuff blocks for disk access... so you'd still end up with a blocking UI to some extent. - alex