[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: (whishlist) Relaxing KSimpleConfig file permissions
From: Waldo Bastian <bastian () kde ! org>
Date: 2001-12-20 21:04:36
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thursday 20 December 2001 11:01 am, David Faure wrote:
> > My suggestion was to allow group access on a derived config class, ei=
ther
> > from KConfigBackend or KSimpleConfig itself. I think the real problem=
is
> > that deriving from KConfigBackend would require a completely 'new' co=
nfig
> > class, identical to KSimpleConfig, except for the permissions.
> > Reinventing the wheel. However, by reorganising the KConfigBackend cl=
ass
> > (and deriviatives) in KDE, maybe this can be avoided?
> >
> > Naturally, the KDE config files should have tight permissions, but KD=
E
> > developers (not just KDevelop) see KSimpleConfig as a easy way to sto=
re
> > insensitive data and want to allow group, if not other, access.
Should the mode be subject to the umask setting?
Cheers,
Waldo
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic