From kde-core-devel  Wed Dec 05 01:36:12 2001
From: aleXXX <alexander.neundorf () gmx ! net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 01:36:12 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Too technical terms in PO's
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=100751617201525

On Tue 04 Dec 01 23:25, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > > > >    "KSuperApp Error code: 12345"
> > > >
> > > > That's helpful how?
> > > >
> > > > At least I could've searched Google for cryptic messages.
> > > > error numbers are horrible
> >
> > Agreed; a text on screen is there for the user, not the developer.
>
> The problem with this is that error messages occur when something goes
> wrong. Normally there are all sorts of nice concepts you can use to explain
> things things to the user, you share a `world view' in UI speak.  When
> something goes wrong this world view breaks down and you've got two jobs:
> 1) Tell the user something screwed up, maybe with enough information for
> the user to avoid the problem 2) get information to the developer for a bug
> report.
>
> Giving the user enough information to avoid the problem is tricky. 
> Sometimes the developer can guess a likely reason ``check file
> permissions'' but in generally error conditions occur when the program
> enters a state the developer considered impossible.

Yes, my opinion too.
Not really considered impossible, but a situation where you don't really know 
what to do except telling the user that something went wrong, and this as 
exactly as possible.

> > The principle is simple; the user does not have to know much to be able
> > to use a computer
>
> This is fine for normal strings, but breaks down for error strings.

Yes.

> > > "Checking this box lets KDE to use shared memory for image to pixmap
> > > conversions."
> >
> > People don't care about the technical talk;
> >
> > Someone know why it is 'nice' to use shared mem for this? Is it faster?
> > Does it mean the memory load is less? What?
>
> Be careful about hiding the facts though.  I really _HATE_ check boxes that
> say things like "Clicking this makes the program go faster".  If it makes
> the program go faster why isn't it always on? Obviously there is a
> downside. Those of us who do know what shared memory is (say 10% of linux
> users?) would prefer the technical string.  How about giving both? A brief
> correct string and then a long understandable version?

I completely agree.

Bye
Alex