[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: KConfig object-orientification
From:       Charles Samuels <charles () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-11-01 19:02:22
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 01 November 2001 11:47 am, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2001 10:33 am, Charles Samuels wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 November 2001 11:22 am, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 31 October 2001 11:45 pm, Charles Samuels wrote:
> > > > This makes it compatible with old version, except for a few small
> > > > things.
> > >
> > > It still rearranges the class structure which is unnecassery and
> > > unacceptable IMO. You also have a complete duplication of the
> > > KConfigBase API which really is unnecassery.
> >
> > Backwards compatibility wasn't my idea (I don't really favor it, for that
> > matter).
>
> Then I don't think it has a place in KDE 3.
>
> > And inheriting from KConfigBase is both messy, requires all those
> > functions to be virtual (slowing it down), and requires more memory at
> > run time (since the members of KConfigBase will be duplicated).
>
> Bullshit, you only need to override the lookupData and putData methods and
> *surprise* those are virtual already.

So send a patch :P

-Charles

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]