On Saturday, 20 April 2024 15.50.58 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote:
> One thing I'm unsure for instance is: do we want to make Gear -> Plasma
> dependencies completely forbidden?
>=20
> We might consider this going one step too far. I could understand if a Ge=
ar
> app wants to provide "more integration" in a Plasma session. So mandatory
> Gear -> Plasma dependencies, I agree are to forbid, but optional ones? I'm
> less certain.

if such a ban would get in place, imposes to treat even more with care the=
=20
tendency to put things in plasma instead of doing a proper framework becaus=
e=20
they are much easier to manage/depend from within plasma (still not convinc=
ed=20
at the activities move for instance =F0=9F=A4=A8)

=2D-=20
Marco Martin