[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Proposal unify back our release schedules
From:       Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2024-04-20 12:46:19
Message-ID: 2185307.irdbgypaU6 () daneel
[Download RAW message or body]


On Freitag, 19. April 2024 14:26:45 CEST Sune Vuorela wrote:
> It might make sense for plasma and gear to follow the same schedule. But
> I really like what we have going with frameworks.
> 
> One issue that leads to the 'frameworks stable, release monthly' was
> that sometimes, even often, you need to add a *feature* to a framework
> to address a *bug* in an application.
> 
> If you can't relatively quickly start requiring the fixed framework, you
> end up working around it in the application and forget fixing it in the
> framework.

I don't follow. How does a quicker Frameworks release cycle helps with this? 
Do you want to bump the Frameworks requirement in a patch release of the app 
to get the fix into the patch release?

Regards,
Ingo
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]