[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: planet forwarding to discuss?
From:       Julius_Künzel <jk.kdedev () smartlab ! uber ! space>
Date:       2023-06-21 20:11:05
Message-ID: 75448c6b-65a3-48c4-8375-4711cd549d60 () smartlab ! uber ! space
[Download RAW message or body]

As it is related I just want to make you all aware of the possibility to integrate \
Discuss with your website as a comment system: \
https://meta.discourse.org/t/embed-discourse-comments-on-another-website-via-javascript/31963


This will at least avoid the problem of split discussion between discuss and your \
website.

We recently switched the comment system of kdenlive.org from Wordpress comments to \
discuss.kde.org based comments, you can see this in action at \
https://kdenlive.org/en/2023/06/kdenlive-23-04-2-released/

Cheers,
Julius

21.06.2023 20:12:24 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau <kossebau@kde.org>:

> Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2023, 15:02:31 CEST schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
> > The downside is splitting where discussion happens but it's not a big ask
> > to expect KDE devs to visit Discuss at times.
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2023, 18:53:56 CEST schrieb Nate Graham:
> > probably nobody is actually expecting you or anyone else to participate
> there.
> 
> Now what... ? Everything is true and false at the same time? :)
> 
> > It seems like the people who have expressed negativity or apprehension
> > about the idea so far admit they don't use discuss.kde.org. And that's
> > fine. But my recommendation for those folks (yourself included) would be
> > to just continue ignoring it, because that's 100% okay and
> 
> I fear the point did not made it across:
> 
> if all planet blog posts would get a discussion thread on discuss.kde.org,
> there is chance comments intended to catch the attention of the author or
> other blog readers (at a later point) will fail to reach the audience.
> That is a change to now. One cannot ignore that.
> If considered "apprehension", why not respect that sentiment and act on it,
> instead of what comes across as dismissing?
> 
> Please try to have the open mind to solve this e.g. by a flag to the planet
> blog registration metadata, if people would like to participate in that
> undertaking and have automatically also a discussion thread on a post.
> Or an opt-out if you think everyone by default should think this is an awesome
> thing to have.
> 
> To state it explicitly:
> I am fine with and also curious (for reasons stated) to see if it works out
> for those who are interested. No objections (would be strange also) to have
> your and others' blog posts announced with discussion-enabled on
> discuss.kde.org
> But myself I do not spend time on discussion on dicuss.kde.org, also not
> reddit, twitter, *whatever* . And will not, given other things in life to do.
> So I am not happy to be "expected" to either have to use discuss.kde.org (as
> stated by at least one) or to miss out some comments to me or other blog post
> readers.
> 
> Let's have solutions that work for everyone. That's also why people asked
> about this instead of just implementing something, right?
> 
> Cheers
> Friedrich


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]