[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Proposal for using gitlab for kdereview process
From:       Jonathan Riddell <jr () jriddell ! org>
Date:       2023-06-19 18:55:45
Message-ID: CANX=XXM=wFgKK=G1RbBDL+62=0C3pWgZXT-++pNCKT+nWSORbg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Seems using issues is more intuitive so I'll ask for a global group label
for issues and update the process docs for kdereview and incubator.

Incubator suggestion is here
https://discuss.kde.org/t/proposal-kde-invent-based-incubator-process/

Jonathan


On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 08:27, David Redondo <kde@david-redondo.de> wrote:

> So there are two new kdereview requests using gitlab issues now instead of
> my
> more complicated idea of merge requests. I imagined a MR to have
> advantages
> for codereview but an issue seems to be less complicated (no need to have
> an
> empty orphan branch, etc..), so maybe we should go with that.
>
> David
>
>
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div>Seems using issues is more intuitive so I&#39;ll ask for a global \
group label for issues and update the process docs for kdereview and \
incubator.</div><div><br></div><div>Incubator suggestion is here <a \
href="https://discuss.kde.org/t/proposal-kde-invent-based-incubator-process/">https:// \
discuss.kde.org/t/proposal-kde-invent-based-incubator-process/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Jonathan</div><div><br></div></div><br><div \
class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 08:27, \
David Redondo &lt;<a href="mailto:kde@david-redondo.de">kde@david-redondo.de</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">So there are two new \
kdereview requests using gitlab issues now instead of my <br> more complicated idea \
of merge requests. I imagined a MR to have advantages <br> for codereview but an \
issue seems to be less complicated (no need to have an <br> empty orphan branch, \
etc..), so maybe we should go with that.<br> <br>
David<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]