From kde-community  Thu Apr 09 14:06:05 2020
From: Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FCgler?= <sebas () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:06:05 +0000
To: kde-community
Subject: Re: Qt, Open Source and corona
Message-Id: <1792078.taCxCBeP46 () lava>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-community&m=158644117522331

On donderdag 9 april 2020 15:29:22 CEST Noah Davis wrote:
> I've seen a lot of people on Reddit and various chat rooms who are a
> fan of Kt as a name.

I'd advise against this discussion at this point, it doesn't belong here, it's 
a topic that can quickly explode, lead to bike-shedding and distracts from the 
very serious topic of "what is a good strategy to move forward in this 
situation?".

Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

I certainly didn't want to start such a discussion, just answer a question 
that tries to draw a line between "what is the part of Qt that can be taken 
into a fork, and what is not?", the trademark (just like infrastructure and 
quite a few other things) are owned by Qt, not freely licensed and thus 
outside of the scope of a fork (so would require investing resources to 
replace).
-- 
sebas

    http://vizZzion.org