[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Proposal: Allow REUSE compatible License Statements in License Policy
From:       Carl Schwan <carl () carlschwan ! eu>
Date:       2020-01-26 17:45:50
Message-ID: GZDnZ9MZWwPStyb9WnbXKVvy2hofkbWcnlncSAqd2OtBcSkoBuBP4tvWl-n1w6HVDKtCb9YYxVQhjzBssIe-TVN3jccmji6_JxlgbNyjsAM= () carlschwan ! eu
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]

[Attachment #4 (multipart/alternative)]


Thanks for your work on this.
Cheers
Carl


\-------- Original Message --------
On 26 Jan 2020, 18:20, Andreas Cord-Landwehr < cordlandwehr@kde.org> wrote:
Hi, since no more comments came up, today I updated the licensing policy wi=
th
the extensions to allow and even prefer SPDX markers in a way that is
compatible with the REUSE.software specification:
[https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing\_Policy/][https_community.kde=
.org_Policies_Licensing_Policy]
As noted in the thread, the following topics still need to be revisited in =
the
policy and clarified:
\- licensing of language updates by ScriptKiddy and other automatic tools
\- better integration of Section 6 and Section 15 into the policy
\- handling of big directories with resource files (e.g icons)
I still plan to look into them, but right now the top item on my priority l=
ist
is to introduce SPDX markers into the KDE Frameworks. Meaning, if anybody
wants to pick these topics up first, feel free :)
Cheers,
Andreas




[https_community.kde.org_Policies_Licensing_Policy]: https://community.kde.=
org/Policies/Licensing_Policy/
[Attachment #7 (multipart/related)]

[Attachment #9 (text/html)]

Thanks for your work on this.<br>Cheers <br>Carl<br><br><br>-------- Original Message \
--------<br>On 26 Jan 2020, 18:20, Andreas Cord-Landwehr &lt; \
cordlandwehr@kde.org&gt; wrote:<br>Hi, since no more comments came up, today I \
updated the licensing policy with<br>the extensions to allow and even prefer SPDX \
markers in a way that is<br>compatible with the REUSE.software specification:<br><a \
href="https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy/">https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy/</a><br>As \
noted in the thread, the following topics still need to be revisited in the<br>policy \
and clarified:<br>- licensing of language updates by ScriptKiddy and other automatic \
tools<br>- better integration of Section 6 and Section 15 into the policy<br>- \
handling of big directories with resource files (e.g icons)<br>I still plan to look \
into them, but right now the top item on my priority list<br>is to introduce SPDX \
markers into the KDE Frameworks. Meaning, if anybody<br>wants to pick these topics up \
first, feel free :)<br>Cheers,<br>Andreas<br><br>


["publickey - carl@carlschwan.eu - 0x7F564CB5.asc" (application/pgp-keys)]
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]