[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Planet KDE posts not about KDE (was: Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed)
From:       Martin Klapetek <martin.klapetek () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-12-11 2:55:15
Message-ID: CAPLgePp1yEk0RHqeCzQqK0SVMttSg6k5UP55YH-q=KvSGQf2Hw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:01 PM Philippe Cloutier <chealer@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> Le 2019-12-05 =C3=A0 10:45, Nate Graham a =C3=A9crit :
> >
> >
> > On 12/5/19 8:01 AM, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:24 PM Eike Hein <hein@kde.org> wrote:
> >>> But they don't, so your calculation is about solving a problem that
> >>> doesn't currently exist.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >
> > +2, let's propose fixing the problem when there actually is a problem,
> > not when we suspect that there might at some future point be a problem
> > if people don't behave well.
>
>
> I'm afraid the problem is already there. The problem starts from the
> moment a member posts an unrelated post, when someone who is not
> interested in it starts reading.
>

But how is that problem of the Planet? If the reader decides to
read something, then the reader can't blame the medium for giving
them the opportunity to read that. It's always up to readers to decide
whether they want to read something or not. The choice is theirs already.

That said, I also see no issue with occasional not-entirely-KDE-related
posts on the Planet. If I'm not interested in a post, I simply scroll
past it.

Cheers
--
Martin Klapetek

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:01 PM Philippe Cloutier \
&lt;<a href="mailto:chealer@gmail.com">chealer@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Le 2019-12-05 Ã  \
10:45, Nate Graham a écrit  :<br> &gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 12/5/19 8:01 AM, Dominik Haumann wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:24 PM Eike Hein &lt;<a href="mailto:hein@kde.org" \
target="_blank">hein@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;&gt;&gt; But they don&#39;t, so \
your calculation is about solving a problem that <br> &gt;&gt;&gt; doesn&#39;t \
currently exist.<br> &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; +1<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; +2, let&#39;s propose fixing the problem when there actually is a problem, <br>
&gt; not when we suspect that there might at some future point be a problem <br>
&gt; if people don&#39;t behave well.<br>
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m afraid the problem is already there. The problem starts from the <br>
moment a member posts an unrelated post, when someone who is not <br>
interested in it starts reading.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>But how is that \
problem of the Planet? If the reader decides to</div><div>read something, then the \
reader can&#39;t blame the medium for giving</div><div>them the opportunity to read \
that. It&#39;s always up to readers to decide</div><div>whether they want to read \
something or not. The choice is theirs already.</div><div><br></div><div>That said, I \
also see no issue with occasional not-entirely-KDE-related</div><div>posts on the \
Planet. If I&#39;m not interested in a post, I simply scroll</div><div>past \
it.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><span \
style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">--</span></div><div><span \
style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Martin \
Klapetek</span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]