I understand RH. The gamemis political = now, is a chance to make FSF a real org to match Linux Foundation power dom= ination recently. They just can't speak directly about this, but use th= e nice inclusion topic, helping then to say the message without been heavy = political sided.

And i= want raise a concern here as well.

The current FSF VP, Alexandre Oliva, i know personally from l= ong time. He is as extremist as RMS, but only in software territory, and se= en like a current twitter post, it shows that is going down to the hill lik= e RMS.

https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/11= 74410267972780033?s=3D21

So, we need carefully choose the words if we want to say a messa= ge.=C2=A0

If we do wan= t to support the new times, but avoid fall in the risk of having aoliva as = a president and FSF will not change at all, can even been more dangerous.

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:34, Paul Adams <paul.adams@kde.org> wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, 08:17 Agust= =C3=ADn Benito, <toscalix@gmail.com> wrote:
we should support th= em, not tell them what to do.

One of RMSs best-known transgressions= took place on _our_ stage at Gran Canaria. We did not exactly take much ac= tion at the time.

If thi= s community really cares about Free Software and building an inclusive comm= unity we absolutely _must_ speak up in public.

<= /div>
Augustin is right though. That message must be one o= f support for the FSF and helping them build a better future for FS, not pr= essurising them over things in the past.

--000000000000aa66470592e2a38e--