[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Invent/gitlab, issues and bugzilla
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2019-07-04 15:43:06
Message-ID: 4334426.c4UhldDp2q () sebe
[Download RAW message or body]

On donderdag 4 juli 2019 13:02:24 CEST Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: 
> I complained about the same thing but I was told you can replicate most 
> of those (OS, platform, etc) using tags/badges and project structures. 
> There isn't a 1:1 mapping of fields and tech we got used to from \
> Bugzilla.

And then I thought to check how GIMP is handling this. It's not pretty: \
four pages of label definitions (and keep in mind that all labels are \
available both to merge requests and issues). Creating a query when there \
are so many labels is exceedingly hard, as I imagine actually managing them \
and tagging reports with them. See \
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/labels 

A second problem here is that these labels are defined _per project_. That \
means that any common way of handling bugs among KDE projects will \
disappear.

Sorry, but I don't see any way this is going to end well. KDE projects \
should not use the gitlab issues feature for bug reports. Use of the issues \
feature should be reserved for replacing the phabricator tasks \
functionality. KDE should continue to use bugzilla.

-- 
https://www.valdyas.org | https://www.krita.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]