[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Licensing policy change proposal
From:       Krešimir Čohar <kcohar () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-01-29 19:43:18
Message-ID: CABnAy3fwTgqO=B5akx2ptkA9ahz171N7DR6QWSKT9jArg=K5Kg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks for the vote of confidence haha
So to sum up though, is CC0 acceptable?
if we confirm that the images we're going to use are CC0 can we use them?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:22 PM Jonathan Riddell <jr@jriddell.org> wrote:

> You can but try :)
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Kre=C5=A1imir =C4=8Cohar <kcohar@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
> >
> > Should we ask Unsplash and/or the photographers if they'd be willing to
> release the photographs we selected (seeing as there aren't that many) as
> CC0?
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:25 AM Jonathan Riddell <jr@jriddell.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The Unsplash license looks like a FOSS license to me.
> >>
> >> It is a non-free licence which we can not use. 'This license does not
> >> include the right to compile photos from Unsplash to replicate a
> >> similar or competing service.'
> >>
> >> > The CC0 and other public domain licenses bring in complexity without
> a clear benefit.
> >>
> >> CC0 is a declaration not a licence and we really can't stop including
> >> works in the public domain, as others have said it includes many
> >> elements of what we ship including other works people have declared as
> >> public domain, UI elements and APIs and indeed the complete works of
> >> Shakespeare if we so wished.
> >>
> >> Jonathan
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Thanks for the vote of confidence haha<div>So to sum up though, is CC0 \
acceptable?<br>if we confirm that the images we&#39;re going to use are CC0 can we \
use them?</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" \
class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:22 PM Jonathan Riddell &lt;<a \
href="mailto:jr@jriddell.org">jr@jriddell.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">You can but try :)<br> <br>
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Krešimir Čohar &lt;<a href="mailto:kcohar@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">kcohar@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; Should we ask Unsplash and/or the photographers if they&#39;d be willing to \
release the photographs we selected (seeing as there aren&#39;t that many) as \
CC0?<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:25 AM Jonathan Riddell &lt;<a \
href="mailto:jr@jriddell.org" target="_blank">jr@jriddell.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> \
&gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; &gt; The Unsplash license looks like a FOSS license to me.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; It is a non-free licence which we can not use. &#39;This license does \
not<br> &gt;&gt; include the right to compile photos from Unsplash to replicate a<br>
&gt;&gt; similar or competing service.&#39;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; &gt; The CC0 and other public domain licenses bring in complexity without a \
clear benefit.<br> &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; CC0 is a declaration not a licence and we really can&#39;t stop \
including<br> &gt;&gt; works in the public domain, as others have said it includes \
many<br> &gt;&gt; elements of what we ship including other works people have declared \
as<br> &gt;&gt; public domain, UI elements and APIs and indeed the complete works \
of<br> &gt;&gt; Shakespeare if we so wished.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Jonathan<br>
</blockquote></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]