[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Improving Bugzilla Status Names
From:       Andrew Crouthamel <andrew () crouthamel ! us>
Date:       2018-09-30 16:57:05
Message-ID: Tuty2ndjTLZlLtKlrqixttFCaIhVYcefRax8WYjLuRSiBPbvIESg4OqKSq3APlVAIpU64ESl7Ap4dI5ZxU7JCRkfEFqE6jhmDB6Vilwu5JU= () crouthamel ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (text/plain)]

Yeah I never really understood the purpose of that. Just set it to reported status \
then or confirmed. Whatever it was before.

-------- Original Message --------
On Sep 30, 2018, 12:42 PM, Nate Graham wrote:

> On 09/30/2018 10:39 AM, David Jarvie wrote:
> > I think that REPORTED is an ideal term for a newly opened bug. Is there
> > really a problem with the abbreviations REPO and REOP? Surely people
> > will quickly get used to making the distinction, if they make a mistake
> > at all. In any case, as soon as the bug report is accessed, it will be
> > clear what its status is. Please keep REPORTED and REOPENED as they are.
> 
> Devil's advocate position: do we even need REOPENED? Does it add any
> value to have a status that just means, "REPORTED, but also this was
> previously closed"?
> 
> Nate


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

Yeah I never really understood the purpose of that. Just set it to reported status \
then or confirmed. Whatever it was before.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>-------- \
Original Message --------<br>On Sep 30, 2018, 12:42 PM, Nate Graham < nate@kde.org> \
wrote:<blockquote class="protonmail_quote"><br><p dir="ltr">On 09/30/2018 10:39 AM, \
David Jarvie wrote:<br> &gt; I think that REPORTED is an ideal term for a newly \
opened bug. Is there <br> &gt; really a problem with the abbreviations REPO and REOP? \
Surely people <br> &gt; will quickly get used to making the distinction, if they make \
a mistake <br> &gt; at all. In any case, as soon as the bug report is accessed, it \
will be <br> &gt; clear what its status is. Please keep REPORTED and REOPENED as they \
are.</p> <p dir="ltr">Devil's advocate position: do we even need REOPENED? Does it \
add any <br> value to have a status that just means, "REPORTED, but also this was \
<br> previously closed"?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Nate</p>
</div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]