[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Improving Bugzilla Status Names
From:       Valorie Zimmerman <valorie.zimmerman () gmail ! com>
Date:       2018-09-29 20:44:21
Message-ID: CACpu0258BV2FkOPKYQk_ztDSaEHPHczxgX8Vh_GcB8LJwi6gTQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano@tiscali.it>
wrote:

> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and
> research:
> >  >
> >  > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED
> >  > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL
> >  > INVALID -> NOTABUG
> >
> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in
> the list
> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need
> > something different for Reopened then.
>
> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the
> other
> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much
> to
> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.
> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to
> be
> an issue.
>
> --
> Luigi
>

OPENED ?

Valorie
-- 
http://about.me/valoriez

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 \
AM Luigi Toscano &lt;<a \
href="mailto:luigi.toscano@tiscali.it">luigi.toscano@tiscali.it</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 \
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto:<br> \
&gt; Hi,<br> &gt; <br>
&gt;   &gt; Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and \
research:<br> &gt;   &gt;<br>
&gt;   &gt; UNCONFIRMED -&gt; REPORTED<br>
&gt;   &gt; WONTFIX -&gt; INTENTIONAL<br>
&gt;   &gt; INVALID -&gt; NOTABUG<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; one issue I&#39;m having with &quot;REPORTED&quot; is that it shows up as \
&quot;REPO&quot; in the list <br> &gt; and can easily be confused with \
&quot;REOP&quot; for &quot;REOPENED&quot;. Perhaps we need <br> &gt; something \
different for Reopened then.<br> <br>
If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other <br>
bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to <br>
discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED.<br>
I&#39;d rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to be \
<br> an issue.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Luigi<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OPENED ?</div><div><br></div><div>Valorie  \
</div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" \
data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><a href="http://about.me/valoriez" \
target="_blank">http://about.me/valoriez</a><br><br><br></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]