[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE
From:       Eike Hein <hein () kde ! org>
Date:       2017-09-05 0:48:36
Message-ID: 7512F6C6-922B-4032-864A-36B6974671B4 () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeiffer@kde.org> \
wrote:
> Here are the results of the survey:
> https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/
>  Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile!
> Cheers,
> Thomas

Hi,

I propose we:

* Turn the must-have list into a wiki table and create columns for each chat solution
* In each cell, use
** ... a red background to indicate a feature is not available, and neither planned \
                nor likely to happen
** ... a yellow background if a feature is either not yet widely available or still \
in the planning stages, with text (in the cell? footnote?) having to provide details \
                including timeline of expect ed availability
** ... a green background if a feature is supported

I can take a stab at the Matrix and maybe IRC v3 columns (especially as the \
Konversation UI rewrite and planned Matrix support imho turns some additionals cells \
yellow, but even without Konvi-NG I think it's compelling personally).


Cheers,
Eike
-- 
Plasma, apps developer
KDE e.V. vice president, treasurer
Seoul, South Korea


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]