[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: Kubuntu and other KDE distribution's use of KDE infrastructure
From:       Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano () tiscali ! it>
Date:       2017-01-14 13:42:01
Message-ID: 26da26ec-92bd-24e2-eb22-d96e7412c4b8 () tiscali ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

Adriaan de Groot ha scritto:

> I don't think votes are the way to go, really. I'd much rather just get on 
> with it. For the FreeBSD project on KDE's phab, I didn't even think about it: 
> I'm a KDE person, I'm interested in delivering KDE software to a particular 
> group, and I do lots of things on KDE infrastructure for doing that delivery 
> (e.g. filing bugs, writing patches, blogging, running KDE CI for FreeBSD), and 
> sysadmin suggested having a Phab project for it would be useful to group 
> things. Yeah, sure.
> 
> I don't see, given the *tiny* technical burden implied by the request in this 
> thread, why Kubuntu should be any different from FreeBSD.

There is a slight difference: FreeBSD (but the same can be said for Windows or
Android) is a completely different platform and the "FreeBSD" project/tag on
phabricator.kde.org can be used to identify which reviews and changes are
relevant for that port.
The fact that you can organize the tasks and review is a side effect of this
reason, and that's why I proposed the creation of the tag (as Community
Administrator, not exactly an official sysadmin :)

I think this is different from *ubuntu (and Fedora, Debian, Opensuse, Arch,
Gentoo, Chakra, Slackware, etc etc) which are GNU/Linux distributions, all
(with "minimal" differences) the same platform (and probably the most tested).

-- 
Luigi
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]