[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-community
Subject: Re: [kde-community] Windows licenses
From: Laszlo Papp <lpapp () kde ! org>
Date: 2014-01-24 20:01:01
Message-ID: CAOMwXhPHFCcd-BGzsri0HTHpKFZ8Wp+7QXfgSPbQbaNedtzDaw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Patrick von Reth <patrick@von-reth.de> wrote:
> In my experience it is no problem having mingw and msvc setup on one system,
> you probably don't want to compile with both all the time but the system
> will handle it quite fine
Unfortunately Stack Overflow and the Windows forum are full of
interoperability issues.
Sounds good that you had no issues though. I am envy. :-)
> For pacman: pacman is as far as I know only part of msys2 , and quite useful
> there to install dev tools etc, but it is of no use for us, as we don't want
> users to install msys to install kde.
Yes, but we do not want end users to install emerge, etc, either. :-)
In other words: it can be managed without ithese helper softwares n my opinion.
> and we don't want to develop stuff inside of msys.
I am personally very much interested in getting that workflow forward.
I think it could be nice to get everything done properly for KDE
development. Consider that the KDE Arch developer nicely built up
frameworks development packages.
I think it would cool to get them ported over and share some work with
a Linux distribution in that sense. Please do not get me wrong. I am
not saying emerge would not remain useful. It is all about personal
choice I guess. :)
PS.: I should have probably continued with this email on the
kde-windows mailing list though, as it is getting a bit too
technical... So pardon me.
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic