--===============3110053197095823858==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2706054.zlDBtq0EML"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"


--nextPart2706054.zlDBtq0EML
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Saturday 14 December 2013 12:13:10 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 11:35:23, Martin Graesslin va
> 
> escriure:
> > On Saturday 14 December 2013 01:54:50 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > Recently I wrote to the KDE Docs team and KDE WWW team asking for
> > > permission to put working copies of the Kubuntu documentation on the
> > > Userbase wiki. Albert raised an interesting objection, which I can
> > > only bring to this group for discussion.
> > > 
> > > Kubuntu isn't a KDE project under the Manifesto definition. Even
> > > though our users are by definition KDE users, it is true that all KDE
> > > developers do not have write permissions to the Kubuntu codebase,
> > > since our packages are hosted on Canonical servers.
> > 
> > I don't see the problem at the moment. Albert, could you please elaborate
> > on your reasoning. For me it looks like KDE would just provide some more
> > "source code" which can be packaged by the distribution.
> 
> Just that this "source code" will be distribution specific.
where's the difference to 
https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/sysadmin/muon or all the *suse 
branches in svn/work?

I don't know the Kubuntu documentation, but apart from installation there 
should not be much which is Kubuntu specific. If it's about the applications it 
should be merged with the upstream documentation in my opinion. Better docs 
for everyone :-) I just had a short look at http://docs.kubuntu.org and I'm 
quite sure that it could be reworked to not be Kubuntu specific. E.g. the 
Getting Involved could be rewritten to be generic for all distributions by 
having multiple sections:
* Kubuntu
* openSUSE
* Arch
* ...

Kubuntu could then just extract the relevant part for their documentation. Or 
am I missing something?

Cheers
Martin
> 
> You can see the original thread at
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=138654918000002&r=1&w=2
> 
> Cheers,
>   Albert
> 
> > That our
> > repositories are used by distributions has always been the case and is
> > also
> > encouraged.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde-community mailing list
> kde-community@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community

--nextPart2706054.zlDBtq0EML
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlKsQgcACgkQqVXwidMiVrr8lQCgj2T6VAX8gaIGZDY5sdNGlPGN
SsQAn1SZdSAcMi5XGsDAnXEvpEhU5ZYy
=y6im
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2706054.zlDBtq0EML--


--===============3110053197095823858==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
--===============3110053197095823858==--