[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: [kde-community] Discussion: KDE Manifesto, "web services"
From:       Kevin Ottens <ervin () kde ! org>
Date:       2013-11-12 6:32:05
Message-ID: 4662983.PJFKltWyhy () wintermute
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 12 November 2013 00:23:29 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Ingo Klöcker <kloecker@kde.org> wrote:
> > Is the "which is approved by the KDE system administration team" really
> > needed? I think it could be left out. If the fact that the action plan
> > needs to be approved should be stressed then "approved" could be added
> > before action plan, i.e.
> > 
> > * Online services associated with the project are either hosted on
> > KDE infrastructure or have an approved action plan that ensures
> > continuity
> 
> I think this part is actually good to have, yes. It's good to be clear
> about who should have the final say in this. (And it makes sense to me
> to have this be the sysadmin team.) Otherwise we'll end up in a
> situation again where it is no-one's responsibility and no-one really
> has the power to say yes or no.

I tend to agree with Lydia there. We're so large it's easy to fall in the "no 
one responsibility" trap.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]