From kde-community  Thu Aug 08 09:05:57 2013
From: Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet () gmail ! com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:05:57 +0000
To: kde-community
Subject: Re: [kde-community] Proposals for dealing with bad behavior
Message-Id: <1766773.Zm0GoT9oMH () linux-606j ! site>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-community&m=137595273422617
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0685040735382416815=="


--===============0685040735382416815==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5835298.yTPTnpFBml"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"


--nextPart5835298.yTPTnpFBml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Friday 02 August 2013 14:44:52 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> At Akademy, Valery, Peter and myself organized a BoF session about conflict
> handling. Valery wanted to discuss the situation around mailing list- and
> IRC moderation; I had a proposal for those few cases (just a handful in the
> history of our community) when things really go out of hand.
> 
> I've updated the wiki page with the notes. You can find there two proposals:
> 
> One to essentially set up a communication channel for the IRC, Forum and
> Mailing List moderators; and urge them to come up with some kind of process
> and/or documentation for dealing with unpleasant behavior.
> 
> The second, the 'stormy day' scenario, is a proposal from myself to allow
> the CWG to deny people who are unwilling to adapt their behavior to our
> community access to our infrastructure; initially for a two-week cool-down
> period but at some point for much longer periods.
> 
> http://community.kde.org/Akademy/2013/ConflictResolution
> 
> We would appreciate your feedback. The first step (the communication channel
> for moderators) is already in the process of being executed; the second
> proposal will need to be discussed and vote don by the e.V. membership.
> However, I'd like to invite everybody, members and non-members alike, to
> comment upon it.
> 
> Oh and from the others who were present at the BoF, besides a thank you, a
> request: please check if it is complete and accurate! I might have missed
> things.
> 
> Greetings and hugs,
> Jos Poortvliet

I have seen very few comments on this. Does that mean everybody agrees, it is 
perfect and I can put this up for a vote, which will get 100% approval? It is 
a bit surprising that we got it right after just one round of discussion at 
Akademy, I think we should create proposals there more often ;-)

Greetings,
J
--nextPart5835298.yTPTnpFBml
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlIDX3gACgkQ+wgQ1AD35iwi2QCbBXbN4ua+i9FQaLoo/vtpEmE6
3B0AoJfJMkze9ArA0Ycw8GjqGDtnli71
=ZqVA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5835298.yTPTnpFBml--


--===============0685040735382416815==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
--===============0685040735382416815==--