[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: qt-copy/src/widgets
From:       Mosfet <mosfet () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-01-17 0:59:58
[Download RAW message or body]

David Faure wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 06:26:15PM -0600, Mosfet wrote:
> > David Faure wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 01:03:37AM +0100, CVS by mosfet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > qt-copy/src/widgets qscrollview.cpp,1.4,1.5 qscrollview.h,1.4,1.5
> > > > Author: mosfet
> > > > CVSROOT: /home/kde
> > > > Mon Jan 17 01:03:37 MET 2000
> > > > Update of /home/kde/qt-copy/src/widgets
> > > > In directory zeus:/tmp/cvs-serv7448
> > > >
> > > > Modified Files:
> > > >       qscrollview.cpp qscrollview.h
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > The new QScrollView is buggy so I'm committing an older one. This fixes the
> > > > massive Kicker applet size breakage. Would be nice if people tested the Qt
> > > > version they are committing with KDE first ;-)
> > >
> > > You can't expect one person to test each and every kde app.
> > > Even the people that are paid to do applications testing find it boring...
> > >
> >
> > Not every app, but at least running KDE would be nice :P It's not like
> > this wasn't a visible bug as soon as KDE is started ;-)
> >
> > > And BTW weren't you among the ones that wanted a switch ? :-)
> >
> > Yeah, but not to a visibly broken version.
> >
> 
> Ok, you've just been elected to test the Qt snapshot the next
> time we decide to switch.
> 
> Come on, this is boring stuff.
> 

What the hell is wrong with asking people actually *run* the new Qt
snapshot before committing it! >:(

> --
> David FAURE
> david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
> http://home.clara.net/faure/
> KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

-- 
Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
mosfet@kde.org
mosfet@jorsm.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]