[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdenonbeta/kparts/lib
From:       Simon Hausmann <shaus () helios ! Med ! Uni-Magdeburg ! DE>
Date:       1999-11-10 7:44:49
[Download RAW message or body]



On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, David Faure wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 10:14:10PM +0100, CVS by shausman wrote:
> > 
> > kdenonbeta/kparts/lib kxmlgui.cpp,NONE,1.1 kxmlgui.h,NONE,1.1 Makefile.am,1.4,1.5 \
> >                 kpart.cpp,1.7,1.8 kpart.h,1.8,1.9 kshell.cpp,1.2,1.3 \
> >                 kshell.h,1.2,1.3
> > Author: shausman
> > CVSROOT: /home/kde
> > Tue Nov  9 22:14:10 MET 1999
> > Update of /home/kde/kdenonbeta/kparts/lib
> > In directory zeus:/tmp/cvs-serv5858
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	Makefile.am kpart.cpp kpart.h kshell.cpp kshell.h 
> > Added Files:
> > 	kxmlgui.cpp kxmlgui.h 
> > Log Message:
> > - first atttempt of a new xml-gui system
> > (only tested with a plain shell gui -- didn't find time to test the
> > merging, yet :-)
> 
> Cool, I don't understand one word of kxmlgui.* ! :-)
> It must be very powerful !
> (And the simplification in kshell.cpp looks good)

It's that thing I mentioned in the mail ;-)

Unfortunately I didn't have time yesterday to really clean up the shell,
but after this is done, kshell is kind of obsolete and we can even remove
it :-)
(making Torben happy ;-)

The second unfortunate thing is that I couldn't really test the merging,
yet -- so I'm not even sure if the whole idea behind KXMLGUI actually
works :-) -- but I'm confident :-)

*If* it will work, then we'll have finished yet another step to make
kparts truly modular --> KOffice will be able to re-use as much code as
possible :-) (less work for Torben ;-)

> Hmm, will dig more into this tomorrow :)
> 
> I get BadWindow errors (warnings) when testing, btw...

Oooops :(

Ciao,
 Simon


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]