From kde-commits  Mon Oct 18 13:32:24 1999
From: weis <weis () stud ! uni-frankfurt ! de>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:32:24 +0000
To: kde-commits
Subject: Re: canossa/kword
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-commits&m=94025353004519

Hi,

On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Simon Hausmann wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, weis wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Reginald Stadlbauer wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, David Faure wrote:
> > > >On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 08:19:15PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, CVS by reggie wrote:
> > > >> 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > canossa/kword kword_frame.cc,NONE,1.1 kword_frame.h,NONE,1.1 Makefile.am,1.2,1.3 char.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 contents.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 deldia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 docstruct.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 footnote.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 framedia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 insdia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_doc.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_doc.h,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_page.cc,1.2,1.3 kword_shell.cc,1.2,1.3 kword_shell.h,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_undo.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_view.cc,1.9,1.10 kword_view.h,1.5,1.6 parag.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 frame.cc,1.1.1.1,NONE frame.h,1.2,NONE
> > > >> > Author: reggie
> > > >> > CVSROOT: /home/kde
> > > >> > Sun Oct 17 19:49:23 MET DST 1999
> > > >> > Update of /home/kde/canossa/kword
> > > >> > In directory zeus:/tmp/cvs-serv28336
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > Modified Files:
> > > >> > 	Makefile.am char.cc contents.cc deldia.cc docstruct.cc 
> > > >> > 	footnote.cc framedia.cc insdia.cc kword_doc.cc kword_doc.h 
> > > >> > 	kword_page.cc kword_shell.cc kword_shell.h kword_undo.cc 
> > > >> > 	kword_view.cc kword_view.h parag.cc 
> > > >> > Added Files:
> > > >> > 	kword_frame.cc kword_frame.h 
> > > >> > Removed Files:
> > > >> > 	frame.cc frame.h 
> > > >> > Log Message:
> > > >> > - embedding parts works
> > > >> > - printing
> > > >> > - had to rename frame.[cc|h] in kword_frame.[cc|h] as there is a frame.h
> > > >> >   in libkparts and this lead to nameclashes
> > > >> 
> > > >> IMHO we should fix this in canossa, too.
> > > >> 
> > > >> The question then is: Just K-prefix'ing, or Canossa'ifying? ;)
> > > >> 
> > > >> I vote for names like CanossaView, etc.
> > > >
> > > >I thought we wanted to bury this name ?
> > > >Not anymore ?
> > > >
> > > >But I agree, we need prefixing, whatever way.
> > > 
> > > Yes, we really need a prefix!
> > 
> > A namespace ?
> 
> I like this idea :-)
> 
> However: How do we name it? OP? OpenParts? Canossa? Kanossa (urgh) ?

I would like KParts or Canossa. "Kanossa" is a no go for me :-)
OpenParts makes me remember about bad things .... 

Bye
Torben

> Ciao,
>  Simon
> 
>