[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: canossa/kword
From:       Simon Hausmann <shaus () uermel ! med ! Uni-Magdeburg ! DE>
Date:       1999-10-17 19:56:26
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, David Faure wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 08:19:15PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, CVS by reggie wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > canossa/kword kword_frame.cc,NONE,1.1 kword_frame.h,NONE,1.1 \
> > > Makefile.am,1.2,1.3 char.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 contents.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 \
> > > deldia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 docstruct.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 footnote.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 \
> > > framedia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 insdia.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_doc.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 \
> > > kword_doc.h,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_page.cc,1.2,1.3 kword_shell.cc,1.2,1.3 \
> > > kword_shell.h,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_undo.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 kword_view.cc,1.9,1.10 \
> > > kword_view.h,1.5,1.6 parag.cc,1.1.1.1,1.2 frame.cc,1.1.1.1,NONE \
> > >                 frame.h,1.2,NONE
> > > Author: reggie
> > > CVSROOT: /home/kde
> > > Sun Oct 17 19:49:23 MET DST 1999
> > > Update of /home/kde/canossa/kword
> > > In directory zeus:/tmp/cvs-serv28336
> > > 
> > > Modified Files:
> > > 	Makefile.am char.cc contents.cc deldia.cc docstruct.cc 
> > > 	footnote.cc framedia.cc insdia.cc kword_doc.cc kword_doc.h 
> > > 	kword_page.cc kword_shell.cc kword_shell.h kword_undo.cc 
> > > 	kword_view.cc kword_view.h parag.cc 
> > > Added Files:
> > > 	kword_frame.cc kword_frame.h 
> > > Removed Files:
> > > 	frame.cc frame.h 
> > > Log Message:
> > > - embedding parts works
> > > - printing
> > > - had to rename frame.[cc|h] in kword_frame.[cc|h] as there is a frame.h
> > > in libkparts and this lead to nameclashes
> > 
> > IMHO we should fix this in canossa, too.
> > 
> > The question then is: Just K-prefix'ing, or Canossa'ifying? ;)
> > 
> > I vote for names like CanossaView, etc.
> 
> I thought we wanted to bury this name ?
> Not anymore ?

I don't know :-)
 
> But I agree, we need prefixing, whatever way.

Hmm, perhaps we should go the "old" way and prefix it with "OP"
(OPView, OPPart, OPShell, etc. ) ?

sounds good IMHO

Ciao,
 Simon


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]