[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/konqueror/client
From:       Simon Hausmann <tronical () gmx ! net>
Date:       1999-07-24 8:52:40
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Steffen Hansen wrote:

> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, CVS by shausman wrote:
> 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	Makefile.am kfmclient.cc kfmclient.h 
> > Log Message:
> > - use the Browser::BrowserFactory stuff I comitted yesterday. This makes
> >   kfmclient not depend on konqueror.idl anymore (I know, the problem was
> >   solved anyway) and thus makes kfmclient smaller (not as small as
> >   Steffens mini-konq-client though :-) and makes everything look cleaner
> 
> I was "cheating" by building the CORBA::StaticRequest by hand instead of
> using konqueror.{h|cc|idl} ;-)

Ahh, I *knew* that there was some cheating behind the scenes when you
showed me the size of it ;-)

Hehe, well, but seriously, if we need only *one* single invokation (and
this is the case here) we might really consider doing this, assuming that
the actual interface is stable.

> >   IMO. (Why should apps need to link against bloaty konqueror.idl if they
> >   only want to embed a full-fledged Browser Part? No need for that
> >   anymore, since browser.idl is available anyway/anywhere)
> 
> Great! This was exactly what i meant when i said that developers needed
> some time to figure out the requirements for each interface so it can get
> nice, clean and minimal.

Hehe, I'm really happy with the current constellation of konqueror.idl <->
browser.idl, and Matthias Elter is even more happy I guess :-)

Ciao,
 Simon

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]