[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-commits
Subject: Re: [plasma-mediacenter] cmake: Revert "Do not find both QxOrm release and debug library"
From: Shantanu Tushar Jha <shantanu () kde ! org>
Date: 2014-03-21 5:35:57
Message-ID: CABQ4Km8P32sgr2b8NB1jevHVioYS_3Z5-hA2MC3mrOa9CeeFpw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Bhushan Shah <bhush94@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Christophe Giboudeaux
> <cgiboudeaux@gmx.com> wrote:
> > This change wrongly assumes that distributions build packages in debug
> mode
> > (which is incorrect in most cases).
>
> If we ask packagers to depend upon debug version, isn't it possible? I
> thought distributions will prefer compiling in debug mode more then
> patching QxOrm.
>
Not really, distros package release versions by default and a user requests
additional debuginfo only when required. This helps keeping packages
smaller.
>
> > The correct solution is to either recommend using qxorm 1.2.5 or patch
> 1.2.6 using
> > Shantanu's patch.
>
> Using version 1.2.5 sounds good idea.
>
I'm okay with using 1.2.5 rather than patching 1.2.6 as we don't use
anything that is not there in the former. Hopefully the QxOrm folks will
solve this soon.
I'll update the README that 1.2.5 is an option as well.
>
> --
> Bhushan Shah
>
> http://bhush9.github.io
> IRC Nick : bshah on Freenode
>
--
Shantanu Tushar (UTC +0530)
http://www.shantanutushar.com
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 21, \
2014 at 10:44 AM, Bhushan Shah <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bhush94@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">bhush94@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br> <div class=""><br>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Christophe Giboudeaux<br>
<<a href="mailto:cgiboudeaux@gmx.com">cgiboudeaux@gmx.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> This change wrongly assumes that distributions build packages in debug mode<br>
> (which is incorrect in most cases).<br>
<br>
</div>If we ask packagers to depend upon debug version, isn't it possible? I<br>
thought distributions will prefer compiling in debug mode more then<br>
patching QxOrm.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not really, distros package \
release versions by default and a user requests additional debuginfo only when \
required. This helps keeping packages smaller.<br> <br></div> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class=""><br>
> The correct solution is to either recommend using qxorm 1.2.5 or patch 1.2.6 \
using<br> > Shantanu's patch.<br>
<br>
</div>Using version 1.2.5 sounds good \
idea.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm okay with using 1.2.5 rather than \
patching 1.2.6 as we don't use anything that is not there in the former. \
Hopefully the QxOrm folks will solve this soon.<br> <br>I'll update the README \
that 1.2.5 is an option as well.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <span \
class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Bhushan Shah<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bhush9.github.io" target="_blank">http://bhush9.github.io</a><br>
IRC Nick : bshah on Freenode<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Shantanu Tushar \
(UTC +0530)<br><a href="http://www.shantanutushar.com" \
target="_blank">http://www.shantanutushar.com</a> </div></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]