[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: koffice
From:       "C. Boemann" <cbo () boemann ! dk>
Date:       2011-02-02 7:29:04
Message-ID: 201102020829.05097.cbo () boemann ! dk
[Download RAW message or body]

I think Cyrille's text is both fair and neutral and should go in

On Wednesday 02 February 2011 08:21:59 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Your file does not have the ok of group B.
> 
> So ok, I am asking the koffice community what they want to see in
> trunk/koffice/KOFFICE_HAS_MOVED_TO_GIT.txt:
> 
> The KOffice project has split.
> 
> KSpread, KPresenter, Karbon, KChart, Kexi, Kformula, Krita, KPlato, Kivio
> and a fork of KWord are now developed in http://projects.kde.org/calligra.
> Please go to #calligra or the calligra-devel mailing list if you want to
> participate in the development of Calligra.
> 
> KWord and a fork of KSpread, KPresenter, Karbon, Kivio are now being
> developed in http://projects.kde.org/koffice. Please go to to #koffice or
> the koffice-devel mailing list if you want to participate in the
> development of KOffice (see
> http://www.koffice.org/blogs/thomaszander/views-and-a- conversion/).
> 
> Maintenance of the KOffice 2.3 release series is still in svn:
> svn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/koffice/2.3/koffice
> 
> Note that the KOffice name is currently under dispute.
> 
> Or:
> 
> KOffice is now developed in http://projects.kde.org/koffice
> 
> See http://www.koffice.org/blogs/thomaszander/views-and-a-conversion/
> 
> (and for the record, trunk/koffice is still part of the common area, so I
> will keep commenting and commiting to that area, the same is true for
> branches/koffice/2.3, what I and other will ignore is koffice.git, since
> some people are twisting my words)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]