[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: KDE/kdepim/korganizer
From:       Thomas McGuire <Thomas.McGuire () gmx ! net>
Date:       2008-03-03 16:12:23
Message-ID: 200803031712.23731.Thomas.McGuire () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi,

On Monday 03 March 2008 you wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008 13:41, Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > SVN commit 779645 by mutz:
> > >
> > > Follow KCal::Person interface change
> >
> > Does this mean that source incompatible changes to KCal were made?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, they have to be reverted.
>
> Hu? Well, it's easy to re-add a KDE_DEPRECATED Person(QString) ctor.

Yes, please add it back with the deprecated mark.

> But why keep SC, if we don't keep BC?

I had the impression that we keep BC. We *have* to keep BC, since kdepimlibs 
was already released with KDE 4.0 and kdepimlibs follows the same rules as 
kdelibs. Are you aware of any BIC commits?

Regards,
Thomas



["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]