[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: branches/KDE/3.5/kdepim
From:       Reinhold Kainhofer <reinhold () kainhofer ! com>
Date:       2007-02-08 23:48:18
Message-ID: 200702090048.25509.reinhold () kainhofer ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Fre Feb 9 2007 schrieb Helio Chissini de Castro:
> On Thursday 08 February 2007 18:02, David Faure wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 February 2007, David Faure wrote:
> > > SVN commit 631698 by dfaure:
> > >
> > > IMAP Quota feature, forwardport from Till's and Pradeepto's commits in
> > > proko2 branch.
> >
> > Hmm, in fact, was this the right branch? Or should I have committed to
> > kdepim+ first? Should I commit to kdepim+ in addition?
> >
> > I'm not sure exactly about the rules for those two kdepim branches; 

As far as i understand, everything should go into kdepim+ branch, tested 
features can also immediately go to 3.5 branch. New, experimental features 
shall first stay only in + and backported to 3.5 once they prove stable.

As this was already tested in the proko branch, it's fine to go into 3.5. But 
it would also be nice to patch kdepim+.

Of course, Allen as the maintainer of the branch and PIM release manager has 
the last word on this.

Cheers,
Reinhold

- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: reinhold@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
 * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFy7bJTqjEwhXvPN0RAqpAAKDDm4Lx6dXXp38Prqb59ncnU7vmMQCfZMH3
3RwqLdxvBmbv8pc+aeWs8qk=
=sxxs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]