[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: qt-copy
From:       Benjamin Meyer <benjamin.meyer () trolltech ! com>
Date:       2006-02-24 9:45:03
Message-ID: 200602241045.03471.benjamin.meyer () trolltech ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Thursday 23 February 2006 20:52, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2006 19:03, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 February 2006 10:59, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> > > On Monday 20 February 2006 21:28, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 20. February 2006 17:18, David Faure wrote:
> > > > > Can't it be marked as "applied for now but will need to be
> > > > > reapplied at the next update"?
> > > >
> > > > Pardon? Are we going to drag this extra dependency over the whole
> > > > QT 4.1.x release cycle? I was under the impression that the
> > > > rehighlight method gets added in Qt 4.1.1. Am I wrong?
> > >
> > > The function wont be added until qt 4.2.
> >
> > So? Are we going to drag this extra dependency over the whole Qt 4.1.x
> > release cycle?
>
> Well we could add a configure check for it, or simpler, a #define
> HAVE_REHIGHLIGHT in qt-copy, that kdelibs checks for (in addition to Qt >=
> 4.2 of course).

If there are no objections I would suggest we do this.  There are enough 
issues gettings developers up to speed to help with kde4 development already 
and if we can remove one that would be good.

-Benjamin Meyer

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]