On Monday 19 December 2005 15:42, Matthias Granberry wrote:
> Good find.  Those ought to be syntactically invalid.  They're too easy to
> skip over.

I've gotten shot by that as well. I was also amazed by that it is considered 
valid. It appears to be a "feature" for coping with macros(which can expand 
to nothing, hence a single semi colon is allowed). Basically, evilness leads 
to evilness. Perhaps there's another explanation to why this syntax is 
allowed.


Cheers,

		Frans