[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/kcontrol/kcontrol
From:       Matthias Kretz <kretz () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-12-04 9:33:09
Message-ID: 200412041033.10494.kretz () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


I have to guess y'all didn't read that mail to core-devel... Frans wrote about 
removing kcmshell from kdebase BUT adding a new version making better use of 
the KCM code in kdelibs/kutils to kdelibs (which he commited to HEAD before 
disabling kcmshell in kdebase).

I don't see the problem you're talking about. And if there was 
miscommunication it probably was that Frans' email was so long that nobody 
took the time to read it completely ;-)

On Saturday 04 December 2004 09:36, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. Dezember 2004 03:32 schrieb Frans Englich:
> > Do not build kcmshell. I'll remove the files later on. I'll also merge
> > libkcontrolcommon with kcontrol since it's not needed in kcontrol, unless
> > someone objects -- speed improvement.
>
> Why the hell do you want it to go? Did you ever inform core-devel or the
> maintainer about it? Not that I have been particulary active here recently,
> but it would have been nice if you *asked*, plus I had asked several times
> before *not* to change anything in KControl before KDE 4.0 that changes
> something for the user. Mantra: It's bad as it is now, but it's worse to
> change things over and over in every release we do.

-- 
C'ya
        Matthias
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                          <><
http://Vir.homeip.net/
MatthiasKretz@gmx.net, kretz@kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]