[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/kcontrol/info
From:       Helge Deller <deller () gmx ! de>
Date:       2004-10-04 19:09:30
Message-ID: 200410042109.30458.deller () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

I just committed a patch by Stephan A. Maciej which should compile for NVidia as well.
Could you please update and test ?

THX,
Helge

Could people please CVS update 
> Am Friday, 1. October 2004 18:57 schrieb Helge Deller:
> > On Friday 01 October 2004 18:35, Sandro Giessl wrote:
> > > Am Tuesday, 14. September 2004 09:02 schrieb Helge Deller:
> > > > CVS commit by deller:
> > > >
> > > > reverting the last #ifdef GLX_ARB_get_proc_address change -
> > > > ismail, do you see any other possibility to fix your compile
> > > > problem ? CCMAIL: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
> > > > CCMAIL: ismail.donmez@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   M +2 -2      opengl.cpp   1.7
> > >
> > > Is there any update on this?
> > > I just tried to update my kdebase, but using revision 1.7 make dies
> > > with a syntax error in opengl.cpp:220. I'm using NVidia drivers
> > > too, if that matters.
> >
> > Hi Sandro,
> >
> > I can't reproduce the problem, and since I'm not using nvidia drivers
> > and such. Revision 1.7 is the only one which works for me, so if
> > someone (like you) who has problems compiling it could come up with a
> > different solution, I'd be happy.
> 
> Can someone explain to me what the "__GLXextFuncPtr" in opengl.cpp:220 
> exaclty means? I found a typedef in /usr/X11R6/include/GL/glxext.h (I 
> don't know if this is used by my current xorg setup, perhaps it's a 
> relict from XFree), but it's not in /usr/lib/opengl/nvidia/include, 
> neither in /usr/lib/opengl/xorg-x11/include/.
> I tried replacing the "__GLXextFuncPtr"-extern declaration with the one 
> found in /usr/lib/opengl/nvidia/include/glx.h 
> and /usr/lib/opengl/xorg-x11/include/glx.h as you can see in the 
> attached patch. Seems to compile for me without the previous syntax 
> error.
> I'm not familiar with OpenGL, so I don't know if this is the right 
> solution for this. What do you think?
> 
> regards,
>   Sandro
> 
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]