[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdenetwork/kdict
From:       Christian Loose <christian.loose () hamburg ! de>
Date:       2004-07-13 20:41:56
Message-ID: 200407132241.56849.christian.loose () hamburg ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 22:49 schrieb Frans Englich:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2004 20:27, Christian Loose wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 22:26 schrieb Frans Englich:
> > > On Tuesday 13 July 2004 20:06, Christian Loose wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't comment the rest, as my point is simple: I don't like this
> > > > > solution, and that's all.
> > > >
> > > > I don't like the solution either.
> > > >
> > > > So far IIRC we always said if you don't want a specific app then
> > > > don't install it (like when you see Cervisia's icon in Konqueror). If
> > > > your distribution only provides our cvs modules as one package then
> > > > blame the distribution.
> > > >
> > > > Question: what happens if the user explicitly installed the kedit
> > > > package but uses GNOME? Will he see kedit in the menu?
> > >
> > > Give a realistic case.
> >
> > Okay, how about this.
> >
> > You added "NotShowIn=GNOME;" to kpdf. I would expect that the GNOME
> > developers will add "NotShowIn=KDE;" to gpdf.
>
> Yes, it would be useful for us if the GNOME developers did the same(which I
> encouraged them to do). I don't if that have been done, however.
>
> > Contrary to kpdf, gpdf already updated to xpdf 3.0. This xpdf version has
> > support for PDF 1.5. So it does make sense to explicitly install gpdf as
> > KDE user.
>
> And does users now about that? Fix the bug instead.

a) it's not really a bug
b) the user will know about it if he often gets PDF 1.5 files
c) what will the user do until the kpdf maintainers do the update? AFAIK kpdf 
isn't well maintained ATM.

Christian
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]