--Boundary-02=_EAHaAi+/gB8Mu0Q
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 29 March 2004 02:01, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> On Sunday 28 March 2004 07:35 am, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 March 2004 14:32, Sandro Giessl wrote:
> > > Am Sunday 28 March 2004 14:21 schrieb Sandro Giessl:
> > > > CVS commit by giessl:
> > > >
> > > > Backport framewidth changes (rev. 1.611) I committed a few
> > > > weeks ago to HEAD.
> > >
> > > Do you think this is worth an entry in the 3.2.2 changelog?
> >
> > I have no idea whether it has a great impact on the look of KMail
> > with other styles than Keramik because I'm using Keramik. If you
> > think that KMail now looks much better with other styles then feel
> > free to add an entry to the 3.2.2 changelog. Something like
> > "Improved look of KMail with other styles than Keramik.".
>
> Ugh. Can someone please explain what this change is about?

In KMail we used style().pixelMetric( QStyle::PM_DefaultFrameWidth ) - 1=20
as frame width (that's the width of the frame around the different=20
panes in KMail's main window). With Keramik style it looks better this=20
way. But according to Sandro it looks better with other styles if the=20
frame width is not decreased by one. Therefore he provided an=20
appropriate patch. Now we use=20
style().pixelMetric( QStyle::PM_DefaultFrameWidth ) - 1 for Keramik=20
style and style().pixelMetric( QStyle::PM_DefaultFrameWidth ) for all=20
other styles.

Regards,
Ingo

--Boundary-02=_EAHaAi+/gB8Mu0Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAaHAEGnR+RTDgudgRAu+MAJ9vYSjpoeuFMCENTiOoA4WYquXHMwCggp4a
t/ltr2upE9vaJqU9oZLslEs=
=45uQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_EAHaAi+/gB8Mu0Q--