[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdebase/kcontrol/display
From:       Frans Englich <frans.englich () telia ! com>
Date:       2004-03-08 1:53:27
Message-ID: 200403080253.27620.frans.englich () telia ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 08 March 2004 02:17, Scott Wheeler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 08 March 2004 0:50, Nadeem Hasan wrote:
> > I am not sure I understood what you mean to say. I didn't mean to do it
> > before the last release. I never said that. I just didn't get around
> > doing it.
>
> Well, Frans wasn't too far off.  It was generally agreed on core-devel
> recently that all stuff involving reorganizations in KControl should wait
> until KDE 4.  Again, this isn't disagreeing with new location, but just
> that we should constrain ourselves to only changing the KControl
> organization at fixed intervals.
>
> This is mostly a reaction to the fact that almost every release someone
> decides that it's time for a major KControl reorganization (which this of
> course isn't...).  I personally often have trouble finding things because
> they move around so often.  I've heard similar complaints from more
> "normal" users.
>
> Aaron mentioned starting a branch for KControl reorganizations pending KDE
> 4. I think this would fit well there.

Right, that was what was agreed on. Anyway, I have plans to branch of KControl 
organization(not KControl as app), perhaps when 3.3 starts to settle down..

So.. we accept Nadeem's changes(has my vote) but next time someone do KControl 
reorganization it is "time for violence" as someone have put it. Or?

(BUT, there are some changes exceptions - the pending KCM UserAccount stuff 
and perhaps some of Benoit Walter's Konqueror/KControl stuff - currently 
under discussion on kde-usability)

Cheers,

		Frans


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]