[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    kckde/kdetraf-70
From:       Peter Rockai <mornfall () logisys ! dyndns ! org>
Date:       2003-12-06 16:40:17
[Download RAW message or body]

CVS commit by mornfall: 

Wrote most of the intro and added two summaries:
- KDE Kolab client version 1.0.2 released [kroupware]
- Performance improvement in kmail maildir code [kmail]

CCMAIL: kc-kde@kde.org


  A            15-kde-kolab-1.0.2.xml   1.1
  A            25-kmail-maildir-speed.xml   1.1
  M +28 -1     01-intro.xml   1.2


--- kckde/kdetraf-70/01-intro.xml  #1.1:1.2
@@ -3,5 +3,32 @@
         <p>Welcome to KDE Traffic!</p>
 
-        <p><strong>Credit!</strong> Thank you and keep up good work.</p>
+        <p>First of all, i would like to clarify the section <a
+                        href="http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kde/kde20031130_69.html#1">1.
+                        Feature requests -- the wrong way [kmail]</a> from last issue. Its
+                wording, or, more exactly, ordering of the posts, caused some
+                confusion -- i take full blame for this (i thought the attribution of
+                individual posts was clear enough, but obviously, it was not the case
+                -- i will be more careful next time and will preserve chronology of
+                posts, as Maynard hinted me to on the Dot, to avoid confusion). So,
+                <strong>it was Mr. Simon who called Ingo names, <em>not</em>
+                        the other way around </strong>. I would like to apologize to Ingo
+                for causing the confusion. Mea maxima culpa. In a different vein,
+                someone on the dot labeled Ingo's first reply as rude and
+                inappropriate, even stating he deserved Mr. Simon's reply.  However, i
+                cannot agree with this, whoever said that. I hope this topic is now
+                closed for good (i do not intend to return to it anymore).</p>
+
+        <p>Also, someone raised concern about my writing of minuscule 'i' instead
+                of capital one when referring to myself. I do not consider this really
+                harmful and am too used to it -- it is my little personal trait. Scott
+                Wheeler stated (quoting): "Right, it humbly states that you don't
+                think that the rules of grammar and syntax apply to you.  ;-)". Well,
+                he might be right... Given that grammar and syntax are synonyms and
+                neither includes the term 'spelling', i think he is not right ;-).
+                Notice the smileys before flaming either Scott or myself. While i am
+                at it, i apologize to all the readers, who find this disturbing -- but
+                no, i am not going to change it. Sorry.</p>
+
+        <p><strong>XXX: Credit!</strong> Thank you and keep up good work.</p>
 
         <p>This issue covers the following mailing lists: kde, kde-devel,


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]