[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: kdeutils/klaptopdaemon
From:       "Friedrich W. H.  Kossebau" <Friedrich.W.H () Kossebau ! de>
Date:       2003-11-06 16:36:57
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2003 15:46 schrieb Dirk Mueller:
> CVS commit by mueller:
>
> no reason to waste cycles
>
>
>   M +1 -1      kpcmcia.cpp   1.14
>
>
> --- kdeutils/klaptopdaemon/kpcmcia.cpp  #1.13:1.14
> @@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ tv.tv_sec = 0;  tv.tv_usec = 0;
>            bool foundit = false;
>            QString _thisreg = "^Socket %1: ";
> -          QRegExp thisreg = _thisreg.arg(_num);
> +          QRegExp thisreg ( _thisreg.arg(_num) );

Aren't all compilers expected to do this implictly, to use a constructor when 
there is an initialisation by an assignement? 
At least this is what I feel to have burned into my head from several books...

Please, anyone?

Friedrich
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]