[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-commits
Subject:    Re: Mail-Followup-To header (was: Re: kdepim/kmail)
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2003-04-06 11:57:11
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sunday 06 April 2003 05:47, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 01:36:56AM +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 April 2003 17:12, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > respect Mail-Followup-To when replying to list
> > >
> > > --- kdepim/kmail/kmmessage.cpp  #1.381:1.382
> > > +  if (replyToList && !headerField("Mail-Followup-To").isEmpty())
>
> kmail certainly has a "reply to all" or "group reply" function? that
> one should respect the followup-to header as well.
> in fact, the default reply action should respect this header, i
> guess.

I don't know the semantics of the Mail-followup-to header. So I don't 
know for sure if that would be correct. But I think at least the "reply 
to all" function should also add the addresses from the 
Mail-followup-to header.

> > I hope we won't receive bug reports like "Reply to List doesn't
> > work anymore correctly" or "Reply to List doesn't respect the
> > specified mailing-list address anymore".
>
> a nice case for "resolved: invalid", comment: "read the rfc, sucker!"

Unfortunately not. Mail-followup-to isn't mentioned in RFC 2822 
(Internet Message Format) nor in any other RFC AFAIK.

Regards,
Ingo


[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]