On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:23:56PM +0100, Ingo Kl?cker wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Friday 07 February 2003 21:24, Chris Howells wrote:
> > On Friday 07 February 2003 19:21, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > > better. Adding it to kdelibs is not the best idea IMHO because not
> > > everyone using kdelibs uses kmail or korganizer.
> >
> > Yes, but there is a need for spell checking in other places. For
> > example, I wouldn't want KOffice to highlight "KMail" has being
> > spelled wrong for instance.
> 
> Exactly. All KDE programs which use KSpell should know "KMail" (and the 
> names of all other main KDE programs). BTW, since the program is called 

I don't have a strong preference either way, but who decides what
programs/libs are there (if kopete would be there, should we include kit
or kaim?)
I think that your confusion might come from the fact that you think that
adding the personal words is only temporary (for the duration of the
session). But it's not true, once a pesronal word is added to KSpell
it's stored (if you use aspell in .aspell.language.pws). So once an
application adds a personal word it's respected by every application not
only using KSpell but also the underlaying engine (be it ispell or
aspell). So if you run KMail once - every app after that will see and
respect words kmail adds to the personal dictionary.
Is that OK or do you explicetly want to have every possible lib/app name
in kdelibs/kspell ?

Zack